Monday, November 12, 2012
This is another Tecumseh Herald response to this letter. Here is the published letter.
To The Editor,
This is in response to Ronda Keck's letter, published in the November 3, 2012 issue.
It seems that we find ourselves in need of a history lesson again.
First, it is imperative to explore whom former Secretary of State and Senator Daniel Webster was. A prominent hiccup in his career occurred during the 1820 Massachusetts Constitutional Convention. At the convention he spoke in opposition of universal suffrage (for white men at the time), and believed that the right to vote be based solely on whether one owns property.
Yes, at the time, any form of universal suffrage was over a century from becoming a reality, but how can anyone praise a man who wanted to limit any American's right to vote? Granted, there are still those few today who cannot grasp the concept of equality.
Friday, November 9, 2012
This was published in the Tecumseh Herald and was in response to this letter.
To the Editor,
This is in response to Ronda Keck’s letter in the Sept. 10, 2012 issue.
Who makes the rules?
In a democratic republic, we, the people, have the freedom to elect officials to represent us in local, state, and federal government. The people we elect then vote on bills that then in turn become law.
In essence, we make the laws.
Thankfully, through the foresight of our Founding Fathers, who wanted to eliminate the very single-minded orthodoxy that they fled from, we have religious freedom and freedom from religion today.
However, Christopher Hitches, British-American journalist and author, says it best, “How dismal it is to see present day Americans yearning for the very orthodoxy that their country was founded to escape.”
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
There is something soothing about a mid-October photo. The palate is delectable, and in Michigan, sadly, can be gone in a instant.
Using the FujiFinepix S2900 camera has displayed some gremlins. Photo quality is good, but can never be considered any sort of greatness. This, of course, can easily be attributed as user error, as I continue learn the finites of the contraption. I could not do dive deeper into the settings at this photo location, as I was blocking the entrance of a local church.
The photo's exposure is clearly too low, masking the front bumper in unattractive blackness. All in due time.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Konrad Steiner’s performance at the Dreamland Theater in Ypsilanti, Mich. was other-worldly, opening with an experimental film in the cramped space. It was abstract, confusing at times, but his fusion of a creative voice over with great visuals made the experience bearable, if not enjoyable.
Next was Steiner’s presentation of Minority Report. To move from such an experimental film to a more modern and well known one was jarring, though nice, especially with the slightly edited scenes to depict a more political stance. Steiner visited class and discussed his approach and politically charged edits. His edits were streamless and very professional. If he wouldn’t have mentioned the edits, most would have gone unnoticed, at least to me.
Steiner’s next piece was Blade Runner, which was less political and more lyrical and covered four scenes edited together. Instead of reading alone, Carla Harryman joined him, sometimes speaking separately and at other times they overlapped one another. Together Steiner and Harryman performed a poem, with the film in the background serving as secondary element.
Steiner’s most intriguing performance was where he dubbed over an old Nazi film. Steiner wore a white dress and moved in front of the screen, becoming the screen himself. The possibilities of this type of medium has the ability to take the written word and performance to a new, almost unlimited, level.
Having Steiner available for a local performance was riveting. His deep discussion into the medium was insightful along with everything that is possible with it. This was my most enjoyed Bathhouse reading because of his approachable art.